Why do we need to consider this

Throughout our evolution, humans have experimented with many ways to work with others-who-share-the-present, and compete with them at the same time. Humans are not unique in this, most moving species have evolved attempts at communal organisation, from ant colonies to fish shoals, from wolf packs to the solitary Panda.

The question today, is whether we have harvested enough information from our experiments, and have developed a good enough set of tools to enable us to consider, and put in place, a more formalised approach to organising ourselves on a global scale.

This paper describes a vision of global human organisation, and will also, eventually, describe how we might transition to it.

As a vision from a single mind I would expect it to evolve under the attention of others.

Now

We live on a planet of fixed size, in a vast cosmic sea that is constantly changing. Our planet will only support life as we know it for a few million years. The planet itself may cease to exist in a few billion years (These approximations are based on our current understanding).

We have emerged from the evolutionary soup of possible creatures to dominate our planet. This has happened haphazardly with no conscious plan on our part.

During this journey we have developed technologies that can threaten the entire species and alter the systems of our planet.

We have started to explore and colonise space, and we have just begun to manipulate our DNA so that the evolution of our species can be shortcut.

We are only here, in this species form, because of genetic competition. During our evolutionary development we have not only refined our DNA, but also the ways in which we work together as groups, and as individuals.

Our history is littered with the records of multiple attempts at organising ourselves, some more successful than others. These are still evolving as can be seen in our many ongoing conflicts.

We have organised ourselves using a multitude of mechanisms to separate Us from Them.

We have formed tribes, states, nations, alliances, trading blocks, empires ….. we have many words for groups of Us.

We have experimented with and refined many concepts and tools that help us co-ordinate our activities, such as language, ownership, ethics, law, religion, taxation, social services, currency, uniforms.

We wrap some tools into cultures that help us differentiate ourselves into organisational units to compete for resources, status, and breeding rights.

All wars are ultimately between cultures. Between Us and Them.

Our current best practice organisational unit is the nation state, which aims to co-ordinate the activities of its citizens to benefit themselves, sometimes at the expense of other nation states.  We form national identity based on national cultures. However, with modern travel methods and communications, cultures are spilling across national boundaries. Multi-cultural diasporas are becoming harder to reconcile to geographical boundaries.

We have also only recently developed our communications capabilities to the point where a thought can be rapidly communicated to, and understood by, all members of our species.

The time is right to apply some conscious control to our activities.

Proposed system

This paper proposes a system of organising ourselves to control destructive competition and promote constructive competition on a global scale.

Most of the policies that make up the proposed system are not new, but what is new is their combination into an overarching system

Weaken Nation states and develop a global culture

Nations are based on self-contained geographic boundaries. Every system and service of government is tailored to the nation. The nation owns resources based on its geographic boundary and the efforts of the people living within it. Competition between nations is a prime source of conflict and evolutionary development.

The proposal is to weaken the culture forming aspect of nation states so that they become administrators of geographical regions rather than culture makers and guardians of ‘Us’.

We should deliberately alter the hierarchy of cultural importance, by using our tools to consciously form a top level global culture that we all belong to.

Headonly

Within this framework, sub-cultures can still exist, but they should be secondary to the global culture. These may be based on location, language, religion, dress, music, or any of the other concepts that give a sense of Us and Them.

What tools can we use to form a global culture?

We use many tools to help us work together that give us a sense of ‘Us’, and we should adopt them to help form a global culture.

 

 Provide Global services

For a system of global government to work for all, the right mix of responsibilities and service provision should be found between regional and global government.

This proposal removes the policy making responsibilities of nations and places them at the global level, so they can become common and efficient across the globe. Service delivery responsibilities should be retained locally and monitored centrally. By moving much of the responsibilities for policy making to the global layer of government, many causes of diversity conflict should just vanish.

The risk of a 1984 like super-state is addressed in the governance section below.

RegionalResponsibilities

These provide a system for the organisation of the Species

ToolsAndServices

And support a common culture

HeadHierarchy

Make the system accountable

During our evolution, we have trialled multiple models of organisational control over our Nation states. Current models include Socialism, Communism, Democracy, Hereditary hierarchy, Dictatorship.....

What is the best model to propose for a global system?

This section requires more work, and can best be described at this stage by a set of principles. The detail required here is for the next level of system design.

Principles

Risks

 

FilesInSpace.com